News

Article

Internal regulations: for a strict assessment of the provisions of the Labour Code

Based on the decision of the social chamber of the Court of Cassation of 26 June 2019
(Cass. Soc. 26 June 2019, FS-P+B, n° 18-11.230)
Maître Cécile ZAKINE
Lawyer at the Bar of Grasse - Doctor of Law
Lecturer at the University of Nice Sophia-Antipolis

The Schindler company had internal regulations dating from 1985 for which the employer had consulted the staff representative institutions.
According to the provisions of Article 1321-4 of the Labour Code:
"The internal regulations are a written document in which the employer exclusively sets out the rules:

1° Measures for the application of health and safety regulations in the undertaking or establishment, in particular the instructions provided for in Article L. 4122-1 ;

2° The conditions under which employees may be called upon to participate, at the employer's request, in restoring working conditions that protect the health and safety of employees, should they appear to be compromised;

3° General and permanent rules relating to discipline, in particular the nature and the scale of penalties that the employer may impose".

This document specifies a certain number of obligations, particularly in terms of hygiene, safety or sanctions, which the employee and the employer must respect within the company. It also covers gender equality as well as moral or sexual harassment or sexist behaviour.
The conditions of validity are subject to Articles L. 1321-4 and R. 1321-1 to R.1321-6 of the Labour Code:
The rules of procedure can only be introduced after they have been submitted to the social and economic committee for an opinion.
It indicates the date of its entry into force.
This date must be one month after the completion of the filing and advertising formalities.
At the same time as it is published, the internal regulations, together with the opinion of the social and economic committee, are communicated to the labour inspector.

In addition, the rules of procedure are :
- made known, by any means, to persons having access to the workplace or the premises where the employment takes place.
- filed with the clerk of the industrial tribunal of the jurisdiction of the company or establishment,
- is sent to the labour inspector in duplicate,
- established within three months of the opening of the business.
In this case, the Schindler company made changes to its internal regulations on the orders of the labour inspectorate, but without consulting the employee representative bodies again.
The CGT union for Schindler employees in the Ile-de-France regional headquarters, the Grand Ouest regional headquarters and the RCS subsidiaries has decided to take legal action against Schindler for lack of consultation.
He argued that the Schindler company's internal regulations could not be enforced against employees because they did not indicate the date on which they came into force and because the employer had not carried out a new consultation of the staff representative bodies and had not taken the necessary steps to file and publicise them.
The President of the Tribunal de Grande Instance was seized in summary proceedings (as a matter of urgency if the conditions required by law are met) for the purpose of establishing :
- the unenforceability of the internal regulations against the company's employees,
- the irregularity of the disciplinary procedures implemented
- to prohibit Schindler from implementing disciplinary procedures based on these internal regulations.
The Versailles Court of Appeal, in a judgment of 16 November 2017, dismissed all of the Union's claims, which thus lodged an appeal in cassation.
The Court of Cassation upheld the decision of the lower courts, considering that the employer did not have to carry out a new consultation if, at the time of the initial drafting of the internal regulations, in 1985, the institutions representing the personnel had been consulted.
Employers need advice and support to ensure that they are fully aware of their obligations. rights and obligations in terms of internal rules and management employees.
Good management in advance avoids many disputes!
Follow me also on :
Lawyer vefa real estate law
4.8/5 - (1889 votes)
Laurent Paule
Laurent Paule
1726989674
I made an appointment with Maître Zakine for a 1-hour consultation in his office. I needed clarification regarding a dispute with my trustee. Punctual and courteous, Maître Zakine took my problem into consideration and proved to be very professional, giving me excellent advice. I initially thought that we would have covered the issue in half an hour; but the hour ultimately passed quickly. To be recommended without reservation.
Thomas Liebig
Thomas Liebig
1726067882
Video Kosultation wie sie sein sollte - sehr einfaches Buchungssystem, Zahlung mit Paypal, Erinnerung per Email, technische Abwicklung sehr gut, gute Verständigung. Inhaltlich also sehr zielführend. Die Beratung erfolgte auf Englisch, was in Frankreich keine Selbstverständlichkeit ist, hier aber exzellent funktioniert hat. Ist rundum zu empfehlen, insbesondere für eine erste Kontaktaufnahme und Eingangsberatung. Ich werde es wieder nutszen.
Bastien TOURBEAUX
Bastien TOURBEAUX
1725364856
Maître Zakine is very professional. I recommend this person to help you with your legal appeals.
paolo costa
paolo costa
1719309338
Efficient service, fast and concrete communication. Serious, kind and helpful professional. Very positive experience!!
Charly B.
Charly B.
1719239503
Maître Zakine has a perfect command of the aspects of CCMI and VEFA contracts. She was able to answer my questions without ambiguity. 👍
Emmanuel Baudino
Emmanuel Baudino
1716616685
Maître Céline Zakine was very efficient, her wise advice was very useful to me and I thank her for her caring support, her empathy and her professionalism.
Cyril Soulier
Cyril Soulier
1714465799
Very good lawyer gives the best advice in any situation! Moreover, we can say that he is a pugnacious lawyer! Thank you for accompanying me during my dispute!
CEAN SEAS
CEAN SEAS
1711529461
Very professional, competent and responsive
Samia B
Samia B
1710354426
Really helpful lawyer who will take the time to explain everything in details.She will not overcharge unnecessary.Recommending for any issue you may have with your tenants.Thank you!
Joe Nookye
Joe Nookye
1709236133
I contacted Me Zakine for a difficult matter. I am satisfied to have benefited from his services. I highly recommend this advice
Wenchao Zhao
Wenchao Zhao
1708007222
very professional!
Sofia Ouahbi
Sofia Ouahbi
1702991281
Master Zakine listens and gives good advice, I recommend
Between 2 Genepi (entre2genepi)
Between 2 Genepi (entre2genepi)
1702980039
Pugnacious lawyer! Helped a lot with our problem on Worthy Baths. We recommend to 100%
Nino Abeade
Nino Abeade
1702798085
Thank you for your GDPR intervention in Paris! Pugnacious lawyer I recommend
Laurent Praud
Laurent Praud
1702630613
Thank you again Master for your responsiveness and efficiency. I dealt with this lawyer in the context of a Parisian case. The lawyer followed the file perfectly and the outcome was in our favor. Best wishes
Oro “Oro Pa” Pa
Oro “Oro Pa” Pa
1702549050
Thanks to Master Zakine for his intervention in Metz.
antonin debono
antonin debono
1702037244
Was able to help us in our efforts and immediately understood our problem. Very competent and warm. I highly recommend.
alain carrere
alain carrere
1701703680
Ms. ZAKINE is of impeccable professionalism, a lawyer who listens and guides you and supports you throughout the case. Thank you for coming to Toulouse.
William Bianchi
William Bianchi
1700665199
I confirm the great professionalism of Maître ZAKINE, who was able to listen to my problem and quickly direct me towards precise and effective actions.
Gilles Fraysse
Gilles Fraysse
1698147527
Excellent contact and excellent involvement from Maître Zakine, including during the first advice-taking videoconference. I can highly recommend him!
×
js_loader