News

Newsletter

3 December 2019

Electronic correspondence and employee privacy, a headache for employers!

Regarding a decision of the social chamber of the Court of Cassation of 23 October 2019 (Appeal No. 17-28.448) This case law highlights the difficulty that judges face in finding a fair balance between the rights of the employee and the legitimate interests of the employer. employee had spoken with a work colleague by means of her instant messaging on elements relating to the private life of a manager but using her work computer. She was dismissed for serious misconduct. To justify its decision, the employer invoked the fact that the comments had not been accompanied by the mention "personal" and that they were therefore presumed to be of a professional nature. The Court of Appeal declared that the messages from the instant messaging were not unlawful and therefore considered the dismissal to be unfair and ordered it to pay the dismissed employee various sums. On the other hand, the lower court judges considered that the fact of having searched for messages of a private nature constituted an invasion of privacy within the meaning of Article 8 of the European Court of Human Rights which provides that "everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence". The judges specified that the fact of having found, in these messages, elements of the employee's private life, made it possible to overturn the evidence that these messages were of a professional nature. These messages became, through the elements they contained, messages of a nature private protected by the right to respect of the employee's private life at his workplace and the secrecy of correspondence. In other words, this gave rise to a presumption of the private nature of the said messages, which gave them greater protection. Appealing to the Court of Cassation, the employer argued that the employee's messages were of a professional nature since they were not marked "personal".
This is how the Court of Cassation validated the position of the Court of Appeal by ruling that messages coming from a personal electronic mailbox distinct from the professional messaging which the employee had for the needs of her activity were covered by the secrecy of correspondence. The judgment confirms the position of the CJEU in the Barbulescu judgment handed down by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR, gr. ch., September 5, 2017, no. 61496/08, Bărbulescu v. Romania: JurisData No. 2017-016884). This ruling offers even greater protection for employee correspondence. The question of protecting employees' correspondence then remains a real headache for employers who no longer know how to position themselves in relation to what they have the right or not the right to read. If we take the example of messages on Facebook, we can wonder if the fluctuation of judges' decisions, whose assessment is made on a case by case basis, depending on each situation, does not place the employer in a certain legal uncertainty. On this subject, the Court of Cassation specified, in a judgment of September 12, 2018 (Cass. Soc. September 12, 2018, n°16-11.690), that the comments broadcast on a closed Facebook account, accessible to a limited number of persons, concerned a conversation of a private nature, concluding that their publication did not constitute serious misconduct. The private nature of the conversations exchanged on a closed Facebook account had already been affirmed by the Court of Cassation in a judgment of December 20, 2017. The judges had deduced that the fact for the employer to access these posts via the cell phone of another employee “carried out a disproportionate and unfair attack on the private life” of this employee (Cass. Soc. September 20, 2017, no. 16-19.609). It would seem that the case law is clearly in favor of the protection of correspondence. The employer must therefore be wary if he wishes to use a private message from his employee even when it is sent from his professional computer, under penalty of being ordered to pay various sums in respect of a unfair dismissal. Even though the employer must rely on objective and concrete facts to dismiss an employee, not all evidence is considered lawful. THE Cécile ZAKINE's office assists employers with issues related to employee correspondence.
Back ➝
Follow me also on :
Lawyer vefa real estate law
4.8/5 - (847 votes)
Laurent Paule
Laurent Paule
1726989674
I made an appointment with Maître Zakine for a 1-hour consultation in his office. I needed clarification regarding a dispute with my trustee. Punctual and courteous, Maître Zakine took my problem into consideration and proved to be very professional, giving me excellent advice. I initially thought that we would have covered the issue in half an hour; but the hour ultimately passed quickly. To be recommended without reservation.
Thomas Liebig
Thomas Liebig
1726067882
Video Kosultation wie sie sein sollte - sehr einfaches Buchungssystem, Zahlung mit Paypal, Erinnerung per Email, technische Abwicklung sehr gut, gute Verständigung. Inhaltlich also sehr zielführend. Die Beratung erfolgte auf Englisch, was in Frankreich keine Selbstverständlichkeit ist, hier aber exzellent funktioniert hat. Ist rundum zu empfehlen, insbesondere für eine erste Kontaktaufnahme und Eingangsberatung. Ich werde es wieder nutszen.
Bastien TOURBEAUX
Bastien TOURBEAUX
1725364856
Maître Zakine is very professional. I recommend this person to help you with your legal appeals.
paolo costa
paolo costa
1719309338
Efficient service, fast and concrete communication. Serious, kind and helpful professional. Very positive experience!!
Charly B.
Charly B.
1719239503
Maître Zakine has a perfect command of the aspects of CCMI and VEFA contracts. She was able to answer my questions without ambiguity. 👍
Emmanuel Baudino
Emmanuel Baudino
1716616685
Maître Céline Zakine was very efficient, her wise advice was very useful to me and I thank her for her caring support, her empathy and her professionalism.
Cyril Soulier
Cyril Soulier
1714465799
Very good lawyer gives the best advice in any situation! Moreover, we can say that he is a pugnacious lawyer! Thank you for accompanying me during my dispute!
CEAN SEAS
CEAN SEAS
1711529461
Very professional, competent and responsive
Samia B
Samia B
1710354426
Really helpful lawyer who will take the time to explain everything in details.She will not overcharge unnecessary.Recommending for any issue you may have with your tenants.Thank you!
Joe Nookye
Joe Nookye
1709236133
I contacted Me Zakine for a difficult matter. I am satisfied to have benefited from his services. I highly recommend this advice
Wenchao Zhao
Wenchao Zhao
1708007222
very professional!
Sofia Ouahbi
Sofia Ouahbi
1702991281
Master Zakine listens and gives good advice, I recommend
Between 2 Genepi (entre2genepi)
Between 2 Genepi (entre2genepi)
1702980039
Pugnacious lawyer! Helped a lot with our problem on Worthy Baths. We recommend to 100%
Nino Abeade
Nino Abeade
1702798085
Thank you for your GDPR intervention in Paris! Pugnacious lawyer I recommend
Laurent Praud
Laurent Praud
1702630613
Thank you again Master for your responsiveness and efficiency. I dealt with this lawyer in the context of a Parisian case. The lawyer followed the file perfectly and the outcome was in our favor. Best wishes
Oro “Oro Pa” Pa
Oro “Oro Pa” Pa
1702549050
Thanks to Master Zakine for his intervention in Metz.
antonin debono
antonin debono
1702037244
Was able to help us in our efforts and immediately understood our problem. Very competent and warm. I highly recommend.
alain carrere
alain carrere
1701703680
Ms. ZAKINE is of impeccable professionalism, a lawyer who listens and guides you and supports you throughout the case. Thank you for coming to Toulouse.
William Bianchi
William Bianchi
1700665199
I confirm the great professionalism of Maître ZAKINE, who was able to listen to my problem and quickly direct me towards precise and effective actions.
Gilles Fraysse
Gilles Fraysse
1698147527
Excellent contact and excellent involvement from Maître Zakine, including during the first advice-taking videoconference. I can highly recommend him!
×
js_loader