News

Newsletter

26 November 2020

INAPTItude and consultation of the social and economic committee

 In three rulings, the Social Chamber of the Court of Cassation has clarified the sanction imposed on the employer in the event of failure to consult the Social and Economic Committee when the employee's declaration of unfitness is of non-occupational origin.

The employer's obligations in the event of an employee's unfitness

Since 1 Januaryer As of 1 January 2017, the opinion of the staff representatives is required whether the incapacity found is of occupational or non-occupational origin, whereas previously, the obligation to consult the staff representatives only existed for incapacities resulting from an occupational illness or accident.

The employer must then request the opinion of the social and economic committee. There is no formal requirement to obtain the opinion of the staff representatives, and the employer can even convene the said representatives by e-mail (Cass. soc., 23 May 2017, no 15-24.713). 

The Court of Cassation has clarified that the opinion of the staff representatives is only indicative.

For example, even if the members of the Committee was in favour of the dismissal of the employee. employee concerned, this did not exempt the employer from looking for a new job (Cass. soc., 6 May 2015, no 13-25.727).

The sanction for not consulting the employer is only specified in the context of occupational unfitness

The law of 8 August 2016 (No. 2016-1088) on work, the modernisation of social dialogue and the securing of professional careers unified the procedures applicable to dismissals following occupational and non-occupational unfitness.

Before the entry into force of the law of 8 August 2016 (No. 2016-1088), consultation of staff representatives only concerned cases of unfitness for work.

The lack of consultation resulted in the dismissal being considered as a null and void dismissal.  

The three judgments handed down by the Social Chamber of the Court of Cassation on 30 September 2020 (No. 19-16.488, No. 19-13.122 FS-PB and No. 19-11.974 FS-PBI) shed further light on the sanction imposed on the employer in the event of failure to consult the Social and Economic Committee in the event of dismissal for non-occupational inaptitude

Dismissal for non-occupational unfitness and consultation of employee representatives

Until now, the Social Chamber of the Court of Cassation had not yet expressly ruled on the sanction applicable in the event of failure to comply with the procedure for consulting the Social and Economic Committee when the unfitness is of non-occupational origin.

These three rulings provide further clarification.

Thus, the Judges specified, by the judgments registered under the n° of appeal 19-16.488 and 19-13.122, that "the employee having been declared unfit for work following a period of suspension of the employment contract as a result of an accident at work, it was the employer's responsibility to consult the staff representatives on the possibilities of redeployment before initiating the redundancy procedure.

The Court then reinforced the prerogatives of staff representatives by stating that their consultation constitutes a substantial formality even when the inaptitude has a non-occupational origin, to the extent that this opinion must also be obtained even in the absence of identification of available reclassification positions.

The judges also considered that the consultation of staff representatives was not subject to any formalism and could even be carried out by telephone conference (19-13.122).

Finally, in the last judgment under appeal no. 19-11.974, the Court of Cassation overturned the judgment handed down by the lower courts, which, by making a strict interpretation of Articles L. 1226-2 and L. 1226-2-1 of the Labour Code, did not punish the employer who had failed in his obligation to consult the staff representatives on the reclassification of an unfit employee, solely on the grounds that the inaptitude had a non-occupational origin. In other words, the dismissal had not been requalified as a dismissal without real and serious cause.

In overturning the decision of the Court of Appeal, the Social Division of the Court of Cassation decided to sanction the employer for these failures linked to the non-consultation of staff representatives in the context of a dismissal following both a non-occupational inaptitude and an inaptitude of occupational origin.

In this context, it considered that "the disregard of the provisions relating to the reclassification of an employee declared unfit following a non-occupational accident or illness, including the provision requiring the employer to consult the staff delegates, deprives the dismissal of real and serious grounds".

Consequently, two types of sanctions apply: either the requalification of the dismissal as null and void if the inaptitude is of professional origin, or the requalification as a dismissal without real and serious cause if the inaptitude is of non-occupational origin.

 

The Cécile ZAKINE Law Firm will help you with all your questions!
    Take care of yourself!
    Follow me also on :
    Lawyer vefa real estate law
    4.8/5 - (1233 votes)
    Laurent Paule
    Laurent Paule
    1726989674
    I made an appointment with Maître Zakine for a 1-hour consultation in his office. I needed clarification regarding a dispute with my trustee. Punctual and courteous, Maître Zakine took my problem into consideration and proved to be very professional, giving me excellent advice. I initially thought that we would have covered the issue in half an hour; but the hour ultimately passed quickly. To be recommended without reservation.
    Thomas Liebig
    Thomas Liebig
    1726067882
    Video Kosultation wie sie sein sollte - sehr einfaches Buchungssystem, Zahlung mit Paypal, Erinnerung per Email, technische Abwicklung sehr gut, gute Verständigung. Inhaltlich also sehr zielführend. Die Beratung erfolgte auf Englisch, was in Frankreich keine Selbstverständlichkeit ist, hier aber exzellent funktioniert hat. Ist rundum zu empfehlen, insbesondere für eine erste Kontaktaufnahme und Eingangsberatung. Ich werde es wieder nutszen.
    Bastien TOURBEAUX
    Bastien TOURBEAUX
    1725364856
    Maître Zakine is very professional. I recommend this person to help you with your legal appeals.
    paolo costa
    paolo costa
    1719309338
    Efficient service, fast and concrete communication. Serious, kind and helpful professional. Very positive experience!!
    Charly B.
    Charly B.
    1719239503
    Maître Zakine has a perfect command of the aspects of CCMI and VEFA contracts. She was able to answer my questions without ambiguity. 👍
    Emmanuel Baudino
    Emmanuel Baudino
    1716616685
    Maître Céline Zakine was very efficient, her wise advice was very useful to me and I thank her for her caring support, her empathy and her professionalism.
    Cyril Soulier
    Cyril Soulier
    1714465799
    Very good lawyer gives the best advice in any situation! Moreover, we can say that he is a pugnacious lawyer! Thank you for accompanying me during my dispute!
    CEAN SEAS
    CEAN SEAS
    1711529461
    Very professional, competent and responsive
    Samia B
    Samia B
    1710354426
    Really helpful lawyer who will take the time to explain everything in details.She will not overcharge unnecessary.Recommending for any issue you may have with your tenants.Thank you!
    Joe Nookye
    Joe Nookye
    1709236133
    I contacted Me Zakine for a difficult matter. I am satisfied to have benefited from his services. I highly recommend this advice
    Wenchao Zhao
    Wenchao Zhao
    1708007222
    very professional!
    Sofia Ouahbi
    Sofia Ouahbi
    1702991281
    Master Zakine listens and gives good advice, I recommend
    Between 2 Genepi (entre2genepi)
    Between 2 Genepi (entre2genepi)
    1702980039
    Pugnacious lawyer! Helped a lot with our problem on Worthy Baths. We recommend to 100%
    Nino Abeade
    Nino Abeade
    1702798085
    Thank you for your GDPR intervention in Paris! Pugnacious lawyer I recommend
    Laurent Praud
    Laurent Praud
    1702630613
    Thank you again Master for your responsiveness and efficiency. I dealt with this lawyer in the context of a Parisian case. The lawyer followed the file perfectly and the outcome was in our favor. Best wishes
    Oro “Oro Pa” Pa
    Oro “Oro Pa” Pa
    1702549050
    Thanks to Master Zakine for his intervention in Metz.
    antonin debono
    antonin debono
    1702037244
    Was able to help us in our efforts and immediately understood our problem. Very competent and warm. I highly recommend.
    alain carrere
    alain carrere
    1701703680
    Ms. ZAKINE is of impeccable professionalism, a lawyer who listens and guides you and supports you throughout the case. Thank you for coming to Toulouse.
    William Bianchi
    William Bianchi
    1700665199
    I confirm the great professionalism of Maître ZAKINE, who was able to listen to my problem and quickly direct me towards precise and effective actions.
    Gilles Fraysse
    Gilles Fraysse
    1698147527
    Excellent contact and excellent involvement from Maître Zakine, including during the first advice-taking videoconference. I can highly recommend him!
    ×
    js_loader